2025 Missouri Law Review Symposium

March 14, 2025

Hulston Hall, University of Missouri Campus

Join leading constitutional law scholars in the United States for a day long conversation about how the Constitution secures both basic liberties and equal citizenship for all. This symposium will focus on a forthcoming book by Professors Linda C. McClain and James E. Fleming that explores these themes.

The symposium is co-sponsored by the Kinder Institute on Constitutional Democracy. Papers will be published in the Missouri Law Review.

8:30 a.m: Registration and Continental Breakfast

9:00 a.m: Welcome and Introductions

Paul Litton (Dean) and Jay Sexton (Director of the Kinder Institute on Constitutional Democracy).

9:15 a.m: Overview of Symposium

Professor Linda McClain and Professor Jim Fleming, Boston University School of Law

9:45 a.m: Competing Visions of the Constitution

Moderator, Professor Carli Conklin, University of Missouri School of Law

Professor George Thomas, Claremont McKenna College Department of Government

Professor Kevin Vallier, University of Toledo, Institute for American Constitutional Thought and Leadership

10:45 a.m: Break

11:00 a.m: Reflections on West Virginia v. Barnette

Moderator: Jessie O’Brien, Editor in Chief of the Missouri Law Review

Professor John Q. Barrett, St. John’s University School of Law

Professor Caroline Corbin, University of Miami School of Law

12 p.m: Lunch

1:00 p.m: Constitutional Democracy and Civic Education

Moderator: Professor Alex Gouzoules, University of Missouri School of Law

Professor Franciska Coleman, University of Wisconsin School of Law

Professor John Kang, University of New Mexico School of Law and Cameron Kang, Wellesley College

2:00 p.m: Constitutional Law After Dobbs

Moderator: Professor Emily Regier, Kinder Institute

Professor Susan Appleton, Washington University School of law

Professor Jessica Clarke, USC Gould School of Law

Professor Kyle Velte, University of Kansas School of Law

3:15 p.m: Break

3:30 p.m: Freedom of Expression and Religion and Equal Citizenship for All

Moderator: Professor Sandra Sperino, University of Missouri School of Law

Professor Carlos Ball, Rutgers Law School

Professor Kyle Velte, University of Kansas School of Law

4:30 p.m: Concluding Remarks

Professor Linda McClain and Professor Jim Fleming, Boston University School of Law

5:00 p.m: Symposium Ends

6:00 p.m: Symposium Dinner (drinks at 6:00 p.m., dinner at 6:30 p.m.)

James Fleming, Boston University School of Law

Linda C. McClain, Boston University School of Law

Susan Appleton, Washington University School of Law

Carlos Ball, Rutgers School of Law

John Q. Barrett, St. John’s University School of Law

Jessica Clarke, USC Gould School of Law

Franciska Coleman, University of Wisconsin School of Law

Caroline Corbin, University of Miami School of Law

Cameron Kang, Wellesley College

John Kang, University of New Mexico School of Law

George Thomas, Claremont McKenna College

Kevin Vallier, University of Toledo

Kyle Velte, University of Kansas School of Law

In West Virginia v. Barnette, the Supreme Court upheld the First Amendment right of Jehovah’s Witness children not to participate in a compulsory flag salute in public schools. Justice Robert Jackson wrote the opinion, which contains the following words, “If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.”

In a forthcoming book, “What Shall Be Orthodox” in Polarized Times, Professors Linda C. McClain and James E. Fleming explore Barnette’s principles, aspiring to give Barnette’s principles their proper role in protecting basic liberties and securing the status of equal citizenship for all, but to temper overextension of them to eviscerate programs and laws crucial to the health and maintenance of a constitutional democracy.

Please refrain from recording any part of this conference. Given the large number of people involved in the conference and the audience, conference organizers did not obtain recording permission.