Ignore, Not Block: A City Official’s Social Media Duty to the First Amendment

In Felts v. Green, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri considered if a public official blocking a Twitter user constituted a violation of the Twitter user’s First Amendment rights.

Clearing the Hurdle of Proving a “Clearly Established” Right to Overcome Qualified Immunity

In Molina v. City of St. Louis, two lawyers distantly and passively observed the police response to a protest that erupted in response to a white St. Louis police officer’s shooting and killing of a Black teenager. After police officers launched a tear gas cannister near them, the lawyers filed suit against the officers, alleging that the officers retaliated against them for exercising their First Amendment rights.

Teaching Values: Court Backs School in Same-Sex Marriage Dispute

In Billard v. Charlotte Catholic High School, teacher Lonnie Billard filed a lawsuit against his former employer for sex discrimination under Title VII after being fired for intending to marry his same-sex partner. The district court initially ruled in favor of Lonnie Billard, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit later reversed this decision after considering the ministerial exception to employment discrimination laws.

Joy Silk Revisited: Gissel, Cemex, and Remedial Bargaining Orders

The 2023 National Labor Relations Board's decision to apply the Cemex standard has led to a more timely and worker-friendly approach to resolving labor disputes. However, will this new standard lead to potential consequences?

Conserving Fish, Forests, and the Separation of Powers: How Missouri Courts Must Protect the Authority of the Missouri Department of Conservation and Other State Agencies

While overlap between the functions of government is often unavoidable, conflicts are likely to arise when state constitutional provisions do not provide clear guidance as to the specific authority reserved for different governmental agencies and departments. In a recent opinion, the Missouri Supreme Court resolved such a dispute.

Narrowing Judicial Immunity: Holding Judges Accountable For Exercising Jurisdiction Where They Are Statutorily Barred From Doing So

In a recent decision, the Eighth Circuit made a distinction regarding judicial immunity. This case highlights a significant opportunity to refine the scope of judicial immunity.

A Tale of Two Statues: Constitutional Issues in Closing a Limited Public Forum

A city in Minnesota decided to create a limited public forum in a park.  Applicants could obtain a permit from the city in order to place a monument in the park.  Two of these permits were issued, but the city voted to close the limited public forum just a few months later.  This raised questions as to the purpose behind closing the limited public forum and whether the city violated the First Amendment.

The Courts’ Rulings Are Final! Or Are They?

In cases of Juvenile misconduct, juvenile courts are charged with administering care, guidance and control that is conducive to a child's welfare and the best interests of the state. If a minor is dissatisfied with the legal outcome of a juvenile proceeding, they may choose to appeal the ruling. However, an appeal must follow a final judgment, decree, or order from the juvenile court.

Eighth Circuit Narrows the Nieves Exception for First Amendment Retaliation Claims

In Murphy v. Schmitt, Officer Michael Schmitt stopped Mason Murphy for walking on the wrong side of the highway.  Murphy refused to identify himself, and the two men argued for several minutes before Schmitt arrested Murphy for failing to identify himself.  Murphy argued that he was arrested in retaliation for exercising his First Amendment right to freedom of speech in a suit for First Amendment retaliation and unlawful detention.  The district court granted Schmitt’s motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity, and Murphy appealed to the Eighth Circuit. In a majority decision, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision.

Burying the Lede: Standard Form Contracts, Non-Compete Bans, and The Federal Trade Commission’s Attempts to Reshape Contract Law

A new FTC proposal could fundamentally alter the contracting landscape by banning non-compete agreements. However, this change could lead to massive unintended consequences.