Aug. 23, 2025
Trump v. Wilcox and the Supreme Court’s Retreat from Administrative Independence
On May 22, 2025, the 6-3 supermajority of the Supreme Court granted an emergency application for a stay, a procedural maneuver that effectively enabled President Donald Trump to dismiss National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) Member Gwynne Wilcox despite statutory protections against removal without cause. This immediate action left the NLRB without a quorum, thereby halting crucial federal labor law proceedings. The Court’s utilization of its emergency docket suggests that it views the unitary executive theory not merely as a preferred interpretation, but as an urgent constitutional imperative, justifying the circumvention of traditional deliberative processes and established norms of judicial review.
Aug. 20, 2025
Minor Marriage: A Major Problem for States
This year, Missouri joined the (surprisingly short) list of fifteen states to completely ban child marriage. This legislation marks an update from the 2018 amendments to Missouri law, which allowed children between sixteen and eighteen years old to marry with parental consent. Prior to 2018, many considered Missouri a “destination” state for child marriage, with individuals coming from both coasts to marry fifteen-year-old girls. This Note explores the history and attitudes behind child marriage and the fairly recent wave of states to adopt full child marriage bans while also considering the implications of child marriage on parental rights, especially for divorced parents.
Aug. 19, 2025
Paved with Good Intentions: Missouri’s Prosecutor-Initiated Relief Statute and the Perils of Criminal Justice Innovation
The road to hell is paved with good intentions, especially when it comes to criminal justice reform. Section 547.031 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri allows circuit attorneys to file motions vacating convictions based on innocence evidence—an ambitious reform that In re Circuit Attorney, 22nd Judicial Circuit ex rel. Christopher Dunn reveals as fundamentally flawed. This Note argues that Missouri’s prosecutor-initiated relief statute creates more problems than it solves, resulting in a framework that is more complex, less efficient, and potentially less effective than the traditional post-conviction mechanisms it was meant to supplement.
June 4, 2025
Navigating Constitutional Waters: The Legality of School Choice Programs in Missouri and Beyond
School choice voucher programs, which enable public education funds to be used for private school tuition, have evolved from controversial educational experiments of the 1990s into a central battleground for religious liberty. These controversial programs, once challenged primarily on Establishment Clause grounds, now face a transformed legal landscape where religious exclusion, rather than inclusion, raises constitutional concerns. In Missouri, Senate Bill 727, enacted during the 2024 legislative session, illustrates this transformation by creating an innovative tax credit scholarship program that includes religious schools despite the state’s restrictive constitutional provisions.
June 4, 2025
Gaming in Legal Limbo: Missouri’s Civil Remedy Shortfall for “Gray Market” Gaming Devices
In 2021, Missouri stood at a crossroads between two billion-dollar industries: state-licensed casino gaming and a rapidly expanding “gray market” of unregulated video lottery terminals. At stake was not just tax revenue or market share, but the very framework of how Missouri regulates one of America's oldest vices. When the Missouri State Highway Patrol (“Highway Patrol”) began seizing Torch Electronics devices from multiple locations as illegal “gambling devices,” the resulting legal challenge forced courts to confront a fundamental question: who has the power to determine the legality of these devices?
June 4, 2025
Noho Ki‘eki‘e ke Aloha (Aloha Reigns): An Example of Values-Based Constitutional Jurisprudence
While Hawai‘i’s government structure has gone through several major upheavals since the time of King Kamehameha I, the Law of the Splintered Paddle has remained as a guiding principle towards a right to a safe environment in what is now the state of Hawai‘i. This principle came into question recently in the 2024 Hawai‘i Supreme Court case, State v. Wilson. The Supreme Court of Hawai‘i addressed a fundamental question: to what extent can a state with a distinct legal and cultural tradition regulate firearm possession without infringing on federal constitutional rights?
April 29, 2025
Banning Harm Without Harming Speech: Alternatives to Broad Professional Speech Regulation
In a significant case testing the boundaries of free speech and professional regulation, licensed counselor Kaley Chiles challenged Colorado's ban on conversion therapy for minors, arguing it violated her First Amendment rights.
April 29, 2025
Pre-Empting the People: Missouri’s Legislative Response to the Voter-Approved Paid Sick Leave Mandate
In November 2024, with nearly 1.7 million “Yes” votes, Missouri voters decisively approved Proposition A, which established paid sick leave requirements for employers across the state. But, after this clear expression of voter will, the Missouri legislature has moved to dismantle these protections through House Bill No. 567 (HB 567), which sought to repeal the law before it could take effect.
April 29, 2025
Infinite Arbitration: How One Click Can Take You Out of Court Forever
Recently, infinite arbitaration clauses have been the center of public outrage, resulting from a dispute where Disney argued that a Disney+ subscriber was required to arbitrate his wife’s wrongful death claim. Although Disney backed down on its stance, the argument left open an important question: would Disney have succeeded in compelling arbitration?
Nov. 29, 2024
The Homeschool Quest for Extracurricular Access: Missouri Senate Bill 819
The most recent venture into homeschool legislation from the Missouri Legislature seeks to expand homeschooling beyond the walls of the home and into the walls of a public school—or, more aptly described, onto their football fields. However, this legislation may lead to confusion and conflict due to its unrealistic expectations.