Nov. 29, 2024
The Homeschool Quest for Extracurricular Access: Missouri Senate Bill 819
The most recent venture into homeschool legislation from the Missouri Legislature seeks to expand homeschooling beyond the walls of the home and into the walls of a public school—or, more aptly described, onto their football fields. However, this legislation may lead to confusion and conflict due to its unrealistic expectations.
Nov. 29, 2024
Arkansas State Conf. NAACP v. Arkansas Bd. Of Apportionment: An Interpretive Rorschach Test
The Rorschach inkblot test is a psychiatric diagnostic tool. During the test a psychiatrist shows a patient a series of ink blots and records the patient’s interpretation. There are no right or wrong answers. The theory is that the patient projects their feelings on ambiguous images, exposing how they project meaning onto the world. Arkansas State Conf. NAACP v. Arkansas Bd. of Apportionment is a Rorschach test for judicial interpretation.
Nov. 29, 2024
Can’t Fire One? Just Fire Them All: The Eighth Circuit’s Hard Stance Against Circumstantial Evidence for Mass Discharges
The National Labor Relations Act protects employees from adverse employment actions based on union-related activities, such as organizing efforts. Under the Mass Discharge theory, the National Labor Relations Board has historically found violations when employers discharge large groups of employees to discourage union activities. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit's recent decision in Strategic Technology Institute v. NLRB challenges this approach, potentially leaving employees vulnerable to discriminatory terminations without clear legal recourse.
Aug. 23, 2024
Ignore, Not Block: A City Official’s Social Media Duty to the First Amendment
In Felts v. Green, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri considered if a public official blocking a Twitter user constituted a violation of the Twitter user’s First Amendment rights.
Aug. 23, 2024
Clearing the Hurdle of Proving a “Clearly Established” Right to Overcome Qualified Immunity
In Molina v. City of St. Louis, two lawyers distantly and passively observed the police response to a protest that erupted in response to a white St. Louis police officer’s shooting and killing of a Black teenager. After police officers launched a tear gas cannister near them, the lawyers filed suit against the officers, alleging that the officers retaliated against them for exercising their First Amendment rights.
Aug. 23, 2024
Teaching Values: Court Backs School in Same-Sex Marriage Dispute
In Billard v. Charlotte Catholic High School, teacher Lonnie Billard filed a lawsuit against his former employer for sex discrimination under Title VII after being fired for intending to marry his same-sex partner. The district court initially ruled in favor of Lonnie Billard, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit later reversed this decision after considering the ministerial exception to employment discrimination laws.
April 26, 2024
Joy Silk Revisited: Gissel, Cemex, and Remedial Bargaining Orders
The 2023 National Labor Relations Board's decision to apply the Cemex standard has led to a more timely and worker-friendly approach to resolving labor disputes. However, will this new standard lead to potential consequences?
April 26, 2024
Conserving Fish, Forests, and the Separation of Powers: How Missouri Courts Must Protect the Authority of the Missouri Department of Conservation and Other State Agencies
While overlap between the functions of government is often unavoidable, conflicts are likely to arise when state constitutional provisions do not provide clear guidance as to the specific authority reserved for different governmental agencies and departments. In a recent opinion, the Missouri Supreme Court resolved such a dispute.
April 26, 2024
Narrowing Judicial Immunity: Holding Judges Accountable For Exercising Jurisdiction Where They Are Statutorily Barred From Doing So
In a recent decision, the Eighth Circuit made a distinction regarding judicial immunity. This case highlights a significant opportunity to refine the scope of judicial immunity.
Jan. 12, 2024
A Tale of Two Statues: Constitutional Issues in Closing a Limited Public Forum
A city in Minnesota decided to create a limited public forum in a park. Applicants could obtain a permit from the city in order to place a monument in the park. Two of these permits were issued, but the city voted to close the limited public forum just a few months later. This raised questions as to the purpose behind closing the limited public forum and whether the city violated the First Amendment.